Categories:
See Also:

Corvette Forum Archive (38 950 posts)






LeftLetterRight





German versionFrench version

Subject:
Re: Had to drop off my baby...

From: Unquestionably Confused <puzzled2(at)ameritech.net>

Subject: Re: Had to drop off my baby...

Lines: 18

NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.77.146.174

Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:35:33 GMT

________________________________________________









on 8/2/2005 1:40 PM RicSeyler said the following:

> Hopefully my insurance adjuster (USAA) will be by today

> to check out the car. I haven`t heard anything from Robert Tau

> (that is a crummy move to me), so I`ll probably have to take him to civil

> court for the deductible. I don`t think USAA will go after him for the

> deductible.



They won`t be going after him for the deductible but if yours is like

any of the insurance companies that I deal with, they damn sure will go

after him for the amount it costs them to make your car right.



It`s called subrogation rights. The carrier, by reimbursing you or

paying for the damages to your insured property, assumes the same rights

that you have to go after the person who caused them.



Hopefully, USAA will return your `Vette to the condition it was in

before Tau attempted to Tautal it<g> and go after them for their money.






Next Topic
From: Bones < >

Subject: Re: Had to drop off my baby...

Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:53:45 -0400

Lines: 4

NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.84.23.218

________________________________________________









Ric, did you ever determine exactly what happened to your car after

you dropped it off at Tau Automotive?










Next Topic
From: RicSeyler <ricseyler(at)SPAMgulf.net>

Subject: Re: Had to drop off my baby...

Lines: 58

Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:09:57 -0500

________________________________________________









I just got a call from the owner, and at first he completely denied that

the car was ever off the lot...

(He was out of town the day I picked up the car)

Then when I confronted him with the facts that the trip odometer had 2.7

miles on it and the radio

was tuned to a station (after the battery was disconnected) without

realizing what he was saying

he immediately came back with "We test drive all cars"..............



I think he`s just covering for the smartass mechanic... Plus I can see

him not coming outright

and admitting anything in a legal stance, but not a moral stance. So no

I never got an explanation

from him. But what happened while the boss was away the mechanic went

joy riding, guess he couldn`t

resist trying the RipperShifter and seeing how the other parts on the

engine and on the vehicle , ran.

He ran the crap out of it and wrecked it. Maybe he spun out doing a

burnout and hit something along the road....

arrrrgh..



Where it stands now, I am waiting for my adjuster then I will call him

with what my adjuster says....

He offered to toss my paid bill of $305.00. My deductible is $250.00 but

I said no, not at this point

till I talk to my adjuster. I also told him I contacted my credit card

company to dispute the charges.

He said you don`t want to pay us for the job? And I said I absolutely do

not want to skip out on

legit charges you worked for but I ain`t paying for a $35.00 horn

contact your mechanic broke...



(to me it`s kinda bad Karma to try and not pay them for any of their

work, even with the ridiculous

crap of wrecking it and leaving grease and dirt and parts laying inside

everywhere) Am I a sap? LOL





Bones wrote:



> Ric, did you ever determine exactly what happened to your car after

>you dropped it off at Tau Automotive?

>

>

>

>



--

Ric Seyler

Online Racing: RicSeyler

GPL Handicap 6.35

ricseyler(at)SPAMgulf.net

http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler

remove u2013SPAM- from email address

--------------------------------------

"Homer no function beer well without."

- H.J. Simpson










Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress:


Title: THE MINI-BALLER LAND ROVER COMETH!!
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:03:07 +0000
Author: SyNaMATIQ

TWO DOOR LANDROVER FOR THE MINI-BALLERS

TWO DOOR LANDROVER FOR THE MINI-BALLERS

Land Rover has today confirmed what we’ve long expected – that the popular LRX Concept from the 2008 edition of the Detroit Auto Show is headed for production. The British-born automaker doesn’t actually say the new ‘ute will be called the LRX when it hits the market in 2011, but it definitely will be wearing the Range Rover moniker and will therefore likely be marketed as a premium vehicle.

No details are given about the coupelike SUV’s powertrain, but Land Rover does say the new vehicle “will be the smallest, lightest and most efficient vehicle the company has ever produced.” Previous reports have suggested the production LRX will share underpinnings with the LR2 (a.k.a. the Freelander) and will be offered with an optional all-wheel drive hybrid powertrain that may use an electric motor to power the rear wheels and a transverse engine underhood driving the front wheels.

Judging from the lone rendering released with this announcement, the basic shape from the LRX Concept should survive mostly intact, perhaps gaining a slightly more pronounced front fascia to go along with the production-necessary external door handles. Expect more details to filter out at the beginning of 2010, but in the meantime, click past the break for the press release.

Read more →

Via: Luxist


More on: http://synamatiq.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/the-mini-baller-land-rover-cometh/



____________________________________________

Title: Awdsome
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:23:08 +0000
Author: Phil

raw00061
Shit is epic.


More on: http://philscarblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/awdsome/