|
|
 |
Corvette Forum Archive (38 950 posts)
|
  
 
Subject:
H.P. to car weight ratios ??
From: Fast1970Vette(at)webtv.net (dave)
Subject: H.P. to car weight ratios ??
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:51:06 -0500 (CDT)
Lines: 26
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.webtv.net
________________________________________________
Is there any information available , or , rule of thumb....for
determining the equivalent h.p. for various car weights ?? For instance
: If a 3200 lb car has 500 rwhp , what rwhp would a 2200 lb car need to
be equivalent in power ? (Obviously less, because of its lower weight ;
but is there a way to determine it ?).
My question arises from what i witnessed tonight on a highway as i was
driving my SUV. Up about 200 yards, a small foreign car (possibly a
Honda) did a u-turn onto my side of the highway. As he got straightened
in his lane, he nailed it , and this thing took off incredibly fast and
sounded like a very loud Vaccuum Cleaner (for lack of a better
analogy...:) ; when he shifted from 1st into 2nd , he layed rubber for
about 6 feet which i could see & hear , then went up the highway so fast
that i lost track of him. I was thinking that this guy could have kept
up with my built big block Vette . Could be he was on the bottle . But,
ive never seen an import move with such power.
Dave
___________________________________________
`If it doesnt go , rump-ity, rump-ity, rump....there is something
definetly wrong with your motor`.
___________________________________________
From: Bob Irelan <birelan(at)chaterNOSPAM.net>
Subject: Re: H.P. to car weight ratios ??
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 22:45:20 -0500
Lines: 30
________________________________________________
2200 divided by 3200 times 500
dave wrote:
> Is there any information available , or , rule of thumb....for
> determining the equivalent h.p. for various car weights ?? For instance
> : If a 3200 lb car has 500 rwhp , what rwhp would a 2200 lb car need to
> be equivalent in power ? (Obviously less, because of its lower weight ;
> but is there a way to determine it ?).
>
> My question arises from what i witnessed tonight on a highway as i was
> driving my SUV. Up about 200 yards, a small foreign car (possibly a
> Honda) did a u-turn onto my side of the highway. As he got straightened
> in his lane, he nailed it , and this thing took off incredibly fast and
> sounded like a very loud Vaccuum Cleaner (for lack of a better
> analogy...:) ; when he shifted from 1st into 2nd , he layed rubber for
> about 6 feet which i could see & hear , then went up the highway so fast
> that i lost track of him. I was thinking that this guy could have kept
> up with my built big block Vette . Could be he was on the bottle . But,
> ive never seen an import move with such power.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________
> `If it doesnt go , rump-ity, rump-ity, rump....there is something
> definetly wrong with your motor`.
> ___________________________________________
>
From: "Corvette Doctor" <corvette_NOSPAMdoc(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: H.P. to car weight ratios ??
Lines: 41
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 03:45:47 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.41.142.214
________________________________________________
Simple ratio (fractions from 5th grade).
500 / 3200 = x / 2200
Using algebra (how you hated that),
2200 * (500 / 3200 ) = x
Rather simple, eh?
"dave" <Fast1970Vette(at)webtv.net> wrote in message
news:16238-3F5A9D1A-177(at)storefull-2194.public.lawson.webtv.net...
> Is there any information available , or , rule of thumb....for
> determining the equivalent h.p. for various car weights ?? For instance
> : If a 3200 lb car has 500 rwhp , what rwhp would a 2200 lb car need to
> be equivalent in power ? (Obviously less, because of its lower weight ;
> but is there a way to determine it ?).
>
> My question arises from what i witnessed tonight on a highway as i was
> driving my SUV. Up about 200 yards, a small foreign car (possibly a
> Honda) did a u-turn onto my side of the highway. As he got straightened
> in his lane, he nailed it , and this thing took off incredibly fast and
> sounded like a very loud Vaccuum Cleaner (for lack of a better
> analogy...:) ; when he shifted from 1st into 2nd , he layed rubber for
> about 6 feet which i could see & hear , then went up the highway so fast
> that i lost track of him. I was thinking that this guy could have kept
> up with my built big block Vette . Could be he was on the bottle . But,
> ive never seen an import move with such power.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________
> `If it doesnt go , rump-ity, rump-ity, rump....there is something
> definetly wrong with your motor`.
> ___________________________________________
>
Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress:
Title: Clarification on Previous Post - "Examples All Around" from Sep 22, 09
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:02:09 +0000
Author: TrueManhood
I really appreciate the comment from a reader who asked me to clarify why I think the descriptions from the previously-posted Facebook status update (posted originally on September 22, 2009) was so horrible. Here goes:
As you can see, the Facebooker updated their status with one of those “quizzes” to rate yourself on “What Movie Badass Are You?” His initial response was “Guns, Girls and Cars… isn’t that the definition of a badass?” I first want to mention that most guys want to appear “hard” or, in this case, a “badass”. It’s that thing inside us, a territorial thing, an “I can kick your butt” thing. There’s a connotation that goes along with that feeling… that in order to really be hard, you must get as many women as possible, you’ve absolutely got to have a sweet ride and the more guns and ammo you have, the harder you must be. (I could continue on with other categories – how much money you have, what kind of house you live in, what you do for a living, how many employees you have, how many vacations you take, how much power you hold, how many and what kind of scars you have, etc.) This is an example of “cultural manliness”.
The idea of cultural manliness is that, as you accumulate more wealth, as you sleep with more women, as you buy more stuff and as your power “ranking” goes up, the more manly you are. Cultural manliness never takes into account your virtue, your faith, your relationship with God and/or others, how you treat your wife/children/family/friends/strangers/etc. Cultural manliness is a facade, a lie, a demeaning and empty way of living. The glamour of being a “culturally manly” man will wear off in time. How many people will a culturally manly man hurt along the way?
Back to the post… the description (in this case, of James Bond) mentions traits that might be good, if explained more and in the correct context. However, in the context they are in, these traits (strong, fast, clever, refined, etc.) lead only to one trait, “…and still get laid in the process.” These traits aren’t listed in order to positively affect the world or in order for you to become the best man you can become, they’re listed in order to lead towards women sleeping with you. There is a great disparity between these two distinctions.
Let me make myself clear here… there’s nothing wrong with being attractive, refined and clever. There’s nothing wrong with women being drawn to you. The problem here is that the motivation to be those things and to possess those traits is skewed and misguided. Deep down, inside every man, there’s an urge to be “manly” – to be courageous and daring, attractive and intelligent. Listen to what God is saying through your urge to be manly, so that you know what He wants from you. Once you feel the urge and know exactly what God wants you to do with it, you’ll be living a purposeful life for God!
I hope this clarification helps.
Man up! More on: http://truemanhood.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/clarification-on-previous-post-examples-all-around-from-sep-22-09/
____________________________________________
Title: 1600 Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:48:20 +0000 Author: Phil More on: http://philscarblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/1600/
| | |
